Blog 4 – Reflexivity
Bloch (n.d.) notes
that “accounts are reflexive, in the sense that the observations we make can
alter the social meaning of what we are talking about as a conversation
unfolds”. Anything an individual may talk about is always open and to
redefinition. The concept of
“reflexivity” denotes an object’s relation to itself. For example people who
wait in line for a bus, or to pay for goods, we can see a person is doing this;
by the way they position their bodies. As well as this the individuals who are
waiting in line will be able to answer and understand a question like “are you
in this queue?” or “are you standing in line”? Garfinkel notes that the ability
to express and understand any activity is an essential part of an action
involved within a conversation. Turner
(1974) “in ordinary usage, reflexivity refers to the capacity of something to
turn back upon itself”. Turner
(1974) also noted that ethnomethodologists hold “that rules (again constructed
widely) reflexively constitute the activities and unfolding circumstances to
which they are applied”.
Heritage (1984: 242)
notes “Reflexivity means that members shape their actions in relation to
context, while context is being redefined through actions”. As an example,
using coffee as a taste descriptor, the descriptors operate in a way to shape
their actions, to find in the coffee what they mean.
One individual has
meanings different to others, and the way they observe is usually very
different, Bloch (n.d.) notes that Garfinkel argues that “anything is subject
to redefinition”. For example, a sales person advertises a discounted food, of
which the individual can reply “that sounds great, what a great deal”, or “why
is this so cheap, is there something wrong with your food”? In either case, the meaning of getting a good
deal on food has changed – it is reflexive in nature, as it is dependent upon
how people define it.
Tools such as video or
tape recorders are used by ethnomethodologists because they are indispensable,
the ethnomethodologist will be able to listen and observe the recorded content
and explore the interactions that take place and the social meanings within the
conversations.
The way people take
pauses within conversations when interacting with one another can have very
different meanings depending on the environment, and what’s being said between
the individuals. When individuals say “um” a lot or “uhs” when making a speech
about an important person to other people that has passed away, to the
individual these pauses could be due to nervousness, or even to one extreme the
individual didn't like the person. If we take it as being nervousness, the
audience that is listening could interpret that meaning entirely different.
This reflexivity
concept goes back to what was discussed in the first blog, of Garfinkel’s
breaching experiment. In his most famous breaching experiment, it “involved
instructing his students to behave more politely than would be expected toward
their parents”, noted by Bloch (n.d.)Garfinkel found in his experiment that
when individuals have been confronted with behavior unexpectedly, they would
in most cases see what’s actually wrong with another individual. For example, if
you were to say “hello” to a friend or family member, and they quickly respond
with “good bye”, we would know that something was wrong with the other
individual. Garfinkel argues that if an individual says something irrelevant or
unexpected, the individual would try to get the conversation back on track.
Bloch (n.d.) notes that “these efforts to realign conversation to the meanings
that heretofore had seemed the emergent ones are called repair sequences”.
Reflexivity refers to
the process where by individuals create social reality through actions and
thoughts. Garfinkel (2005) argues that “human
interaction is reflexive in that humans interpret cues, gestures, words, and
other information from one another in order to sustain reality”. Anything and
everything is interpreted differently by every individual. As explained before
the ways in which we say something can determine how a conversation will go on,
be interrupted due to unexpected response, or finished. Ethnomethodologists
look for ways in how conversations have meaning through interaction, as well as
how people define the meanings and actions that take place. Referring to the
breaching experiment, which looked in how breaking social norms can have an
effect in society, it’s the same here, when we change the social norm, such as
say “good bye” to someone after they have said “hello” because it is an
unexpected response, it can be interpreted differently from the other
individual. One may think there is something wrong, they don’t want to talk, or
they are being rude.
REFERENCES
Bloch, Jon P. (n.d.)
“Harold Garfinkel”. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Retrieved 28 November 2012.
(http://home.southernct.edu/~blochj1/eth2.html)
Garfinkel, Harold.
2005-2006. “World of Sociology on Harold Garfinkel”. Bookrags. Retrieved 27 November 2012. (http://www.bookrags.com/biography/harold-garfinkel-soc/)
Heritage, John. 1984, Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge,
U.K: Polity Press.
Turner, Roy 1974 (ed.),
Ethnomethodology (Middlesex: Penquin,). Retrieved
28 November 2012. (http://www2.hawaii.edu/~manicas/pdf_files/New_Courses/Garfinkelglossary.pdf)
No comments:
Post a Comment